How Did The Republican And Democratic Parties Change In The 1970s And 1980s

The realignment of black voters from the Republican Political party to the Democratic Party that began in the late 1920s proliferated during this era. This process involved a "push button and pull": the refusal by Republicans to pursue civil rights alienated many black voters, while efforts—shallow though they were—by northern Democrats to open opportunities for African Americans gave black voters reasons to switch parties.²⁶

The 1932 presidential competition betwixt incumbent Republican President Herbert Hoover and Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt was something of a turning point. During his first term, Hoover had tried to ingratiate himself with southern segregationists, and his assistants had failed to implement economic policies to assist African Americans laid low by the Groovy Low. Still, Hoover received between ii-thirds and three-quarters of the blackness vote in northern urban wards.²⁷ Well-nigh black voters sided with Republicans less out of loyalty than because they were loath to support a candidate whose Democratic Political party had zealously suppressed their political rights in the South. African Americans mistrusted FDR because of his party affiliation, his evasiveness about race in the campaign, and his choice of a running mate, House Speaker John Nance Garner of Texas.²⁸

Equally late as the mid-1930s, African American Republican John R. Lynch, who had represented Mississippi in the House during and after Reconstruction, summed upwardly the sentiments of older blackness voters and upper middle-class professionals: "The colored voters cannot aid but experience that in voting the Democratic ticket in national elections they will be voting to give their indorsement [sic] and their approval to every incorrect of which they are victims, every right of which they are deprived, and every injustice of which they suffer."²⁹

/tiles/not-drove/b/baic_cont_3_depriest_oscar_smithsonian_-618ns0227109-01pm.xml Epitome courtesy of Scurlock Studio Records, Archives Middle, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Establishment Built-in in Alabama, Representative Oscar De Priest became the first African American elected from the N and the commencement to be elected in the 20th century.

Illinois'southward First Congressional District provides a window into the process of blackness political realignment in northern cities. Prior to becoming solidly Democratic in 1934, the Southward Chicago district elected Republican Oscar De Priest in 1928, 1930, and 1932. Southern African Americans, who swelled the metropolis's population during that period giving it the second-largest urban black population in the state past 1930, encountered an established Republican machine that courted blackness voters and extended patronage jobs. The party offered these migrants an outlet for political participation that was unimaginable in the Jim Crow South. African Americans voted in droves for machine politicians like William Hale (Big Bill) Thompson, who regularly corralled at to the lowest degree 60 pct of the vote in the majority-blackness 2nd and 3rd Wards. Mayor Thompson and the car promoted black politicians such equally De Priest who, in 1915, became the city'due south first African-American alderman, the equivalent of a city councilman. Black voters remained exceedingly loyal to the Republican ticket.^thirty

Indeed, the near common political experience African-American Members of this era shared was their involvement in politics at the ward and precinct levels. The Chicago political machines run past Thompson and, later, Democrats such as Edward J. Kelly and Richard J. Daley, sent nigh one-3rd of the black Members of this era to Capitol Hill. Local and regional political machines recognized the voting power of the growing African-American urban population long earlier the national parties realized its potential. At the beginning of this era, the human relationship betwixt black politicians and party bosses was strong, and many black Members of Congress placed party loyalty above all else. But past the late 1960s, equally black politicians began to assemble their ain ability bases, carving out a mensurate of independence, they often challenged the machine when party interests conflicted with problems important to the black community. Dissimilar before black Members who relied on the established political machines to launch their careers, these Members, most of whom had grown upwards in the cities they represented, managed to forge political bases separate from the ascendant party construction. By linking familial and community connections with widespread borough engagement, they routinely clashed with the entrenched political powers.³¹

Discontent with the Hoover administration'southward halting efforts to revive the Depression-era economy also loosened African-American ties to the Republican Party. Nationally, the staggering financial collapse hit black Americans harder than well-nigh other groups. Thousands had already lost agricultural jobs in the mid-1920s due to the failing cotton wool marketplace.³² Others had lost industrial jobs in the first stages of economic contraction, so black workers nationally were already in the grips of an economic low before the stock market complanate in Oct 1929. By the early 1930s, 38 percent of African Americans were unemployed compared to 17 percent of whites.³³ A Roosevelt assistants report found that black Americans constituted 20 per centum of everyone on the welfare rolls, even though they accounted for just 10 percent of the total population. In Chicago, 1-quaternary of welfare recipients were black, although black residents made up but six pct of the city'southward total population.³⁴

/tiles/non-collection/b/baic_cont_3_african-americans-wwii-224-Bethune-and-E-Roosevelt-PBA-10-F-561.xml Epitome courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration At the urging of First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt (middle), Mary McLeod Bethune (left), a leading African-American educator, was appointed to head the Segmentation of Negro Affairs of the National Youth Administration.

Some African-American politicians in the early on 1930s switched parties to advance their own careers while simultaneously helping their black communities.³⁵Arthur Mitchell and William Dawson epitomized a younger cadre of African Americans who were "ambitious and impatient with the entrenched black Republican leadership, [seeking] a gamble for personal advancement in the concurrent rise of the national Democratic political party."³⁶ Paid to speak on behalf of Hoover's 1928 presidential campaign, Mitchell encountered the De Priest entrada at a Chicago date and shortly thereafter joined De Priest's 2nd Ward Regular Republican Organization, hoping to challenge De Priest in the primary ballot. But after evaluating De Priest's control of the motorcar, Mitchell switched parties to entrada for Roosevelt in 1932. Two years later on, he successfully unseated De Priest, fifty-fifty though the incumbent retained the majority of the black vote. Mitchell became the first African American elected to Congress as a Democrat—running largely on a platform that tapped into urban black support for the economical relief provided by New Bargain programs. "I was elected partly on the accomplishment of your administration," Mitchell wrote President Roosevelt shortly after starting his term in office, "and partly on the hope that I would stand [in] back of your administration."³⁷

Even more telling was the revolt of De Priest's protégé, William Dawson, who won election to the Chicago metropolis council equally a Republican with De Priest's backing in 1932. 6 years later, Dawson defeated De Priest in the 1938 GOP primary, but failed to unseat Mitchell in the general ballot. Dawson then lost his seat on the urban center council when De Priest allies blocked his re-nomination. But Dawson soon seized an opportunity extended by his 1-fourth dimension opponents. Working with Democratic mayoral incumbent Ed Kelly, Dawson changed parties and became Autonomous committeeman in the Second Ward, immigration a path to succeed Mitchell upon his retirement from the House in 1942. Dawson's example epitomized the willingness of Autonomous bosses like Kelly to recruit African Americans past using their political machines.³⁸

Additionally, black voters nationwide began leaving the Republican Political party because of the growing perception that local Democratic organizations better represented their interests. Local patronage positions and nationally administered emergency relief programs in Depression-era Chicago and other cities, for instance, proved crucial in attracting African-American support.³⁹ While the New Deal failed to extend as much economic relief to black Americans as to whites, the tangible assistance they provided conferred a sense that the system was at least addressing a few issues that were important to African Americans. For those who had been marginalized or ignored for so long, even the largely symbolic efforts of the Roosevelt administration inspired hope and renewed involvement in the political process.⁴⁰

As the older generation of blackness voters disappeared, the Democratic machines that dominated northern city wards courted the next generation of black voters. Past 1936 only 28 percent of African Americans nationally voted for Republican nominee Alf Landon—less than half the number who had voted for Hoover just four years before.⁴¹ Over time, the party affiliations of blackness Americans in Congress became equally ane-sided. Including Oscar De Priest, just ix black Republicans were elected to Congress between 1929 and 2017—about 7 percent of the African Americans to serve in that time span.⁴²

The Limits of New Deal Reform

Despite the growing support from blackness voters, President Franklin D. Roosevelt remained aloof and ambivalent virtually blackness civil rights. His economical policies depended on the support of southern congressional leaders, and FDR refused to risk that support by challenging segregation in the South. During Roosevelt'southward beginning term, the administration focused squarely on mitigating the economic travails of the Depression. This required a shut working relationship with Congresses dominated by racially conservative southern Democrats, including several Speakers and well-nigh of the chairmen of cardinal committees. "Economic reconstruction took precedence over all other concerns," observed historian Harvard Sitkoff. "Congress held the ability of the pocketbook, and the South held power in Congress."⁴³

NAACP Anti-Lynching Protest /tiles/non-collection/b/baic_cont_3_anti-lynching_protest_1927_LC-USZ62-110578.xml Image courtesy of the Library of Congress Members of the NAACP New York City Youth Council picket in 1937 on behalf of anti-lynching legislation in front of the Strand Theater in New York Urban center'southward Times Square. That same twelvemonth an anti-lynching bill passed the U.S. House, simply died in the Senate.

Other institutional and structural reforms implemented by the assistants, however, eclipsed the President's impassivity toward black civil rights activists.⁴⁴ Absent Roosevelt's hands-on involvement, progressive New Dealers advanced the cause of African Americans, transforming how many black voters perceived the Democratic Political party.⁴⁵ First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt prodded her hubby to be more responsive and cultivated connections with black leaders, such as educator and women's rights activist Mary McLeod Bethune. Ane historian described the First Lady equally an "unofficial ombudsman for the Negro."⁴⁶Harold Ickes, a cardinal Roosevelt appointee and Secretary of the Interior Department, was some other prominent abet for African Americans. A onetime president of the Chicago National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and a quondam Republican, Ickes banned segregation from his section; other executive agencies followed his example. Every bit director of the Public Works Administration, Ickes too stipulated that the bureau'due south federal contractors must hire a percentage of blackness employees equal to or higher than their percentage of the workforce recorded in the 1930 occupational census.⁴⁷

The failure to pass anti-lynching legislation underscored the limitations of reform under FDR. In this instance—dissimilar in the early 1920s when there were no black Representatives in Congress—an African-American Member of Congress, Arthur Mitchell, refused to endorse legislation supported by the NAACP. Moreover, Mitchell introduced his ain anti-lynching nib in the 74th Congress (1935–1937), which critics assailed equally weak for providing far more than lenient sentences and containing many legal ambiguities. Given the choice, Southerners favored Mitchell'southward bill, although they amended it considerably in the Judiciary Committee, further weakening its provisions. Meanwhile, Mitchell waged a public relations blitz on behalf of his beak, including a national radio broadcast. Just when reformers convincingly tabled Mitchell'due south proposal early in the 75th Congress (1937–1939) did he enlist in the entrada to support the NAACP measure out—smarting from the realization that Judiciary Commission Chairman Hatton Sumners of Texas had misled and used him. The NAACP measure passed the Business firm in April 1937 by a vote of 277 to 120 merely was never enacted into law. Instead, Southerners in the Senate effectively buried it in early 1938 by blocking efforts to bring it to an upwards-or-downward vote on the floor.⁴⁸The rivalry between Mitchell and the NAACP, meanwhile, forecast future issues. Chiefly, it revealed that African-American Members and outside advocacy groups sometimes worked at cantankerous-purposes, confounding civil rights supporters in Congress and providing opponents a wedge for blocking legislation.

Adjacent Section